Powered by Blogger.

7 courses in heaven

Monday, April 29, 2013

Friday night after my move, my mom and I had plans to attend the Best of the Best Farm Start fundraiser dinner at Cambridge Mill. We thought it would just be a straightforward dinner, but little did we know that we had a 7 course meal - no wait, feast - ahead of us!

The view from one of the rooms - so gorgeous!

The dinner was put on by five local restaurants: Ancaster MillCambridge MillEarth to Table Bread Bar, Spencers at the Waterfront, and Whistle Bear. What ties these restaurants together is their use of local ingredients and emphasis on supporting local farmers. In fact, the Landmark Group, which owns most of those restaurants, actually owns a farm that produces food for them. The farm is part of the Farm Start initiative, which helps to support and encourage a new generation of farmers.

This dinner was a fundraiser for Farm Start, which I was happy to support - I'm a big advocate for local eating because of all the benefits for the local economy, food security, the environment and personal health!

Now on to the food... Before dinner there were h'ors d'oeuvres at stations throughout the building. Whistle Bear's appetizer was a cornbread toast topped with bacon jam - this was easily my favourite appetizer of the night. I even asked the chef if he would start jarring and selling that jam. I hope he does!


My other favourite was the grilled bacon wrapped prunes with a red wine reduction from Earth to Table Bread Bar. 


I also enjoyed the other appetizers I tried: pork belly ssams from Ancaster Mill and puff pastry with beef tongue and a pea and bone marrow puree from Cambridge Mill.


At 7:30 we all sat down to dinner, which was 7 courses each prepared by one of the participating restaurants. Each course also came with a wine pairing, but since I'm not a wine connaisseur, I didn't pay too much attention to them. I just sipped and enjoyed them - well, some of them.

Anyways, we started with an amuse bouche, which was a sunflower seed pate stuffed wonton ravioli with a smear of soft cheese and julienne apples. This tasted really fresh and light, and I loved the sunflower seed flavour.


The next course was made by Whistle Bear and it was a salad with heirloom beets, Monforte piacere cheese, lardo (cured pork fat), and a homemade cumin cracker. This was one of my favourite courses - the cheese was amazing!


Ancaster Mill prepared the fish course, which was wild chinook salmon, cold smoked gravalax, crispy skin, and roe in a miso broth. I expected to love this one, but it was just okay. The flavours were good, just not very exciting.


I really loved the next dish by Spencers on the Waterfront. It was Chassagne Farms quail with foie gras, apple, egg, and radish. The crispy quail was delicious!


The next course by Cambridge Mill was my least favourite of the night. It was Joe Abate rabbit ballotine with pickled tongue and rabbit offal. I'm just not a fan of rabbit's slimy texture!


The next course by Earth to Table Bread Bar was one of my favourites: suckling pig terrine with potato puree, smoked shallots, and ramps. The terrine had a delicious bread crumb coating, so it tasted almost like schnitzel. And paired with the potatoes, it was such a comforting combination!


After all these courses, you would think dessert would be next... but no, we were served a pre-dessert first!!! It was house made ricotta with shaved dark chocolate and crispy sweet crumbled wafer. We all agreed it would have tasted even better with some candied orange peel or orange zest, but it was still really delicious.


Unfortunately mom and I had to duck out after this course because we had to pick up my dad at the airport at midnight. I regret that I didn't get to try the dessert, but don't know if I would have even had room for it - I was stuffed by this point!

I woke up the next day feeling like I had a food hangover. I was fatigued and foggy headed and absolutely stuffed! I was barely even hungry all day, which is so unlike me. It was so worth it though - I'm really glad I got to experience this evening of amazing cooking, fresh ingredients, and local food! A big thank you to the Landmark Group and all the participating restaurants.

What is the largest number of courses you've ever had in one sitting?

What dish from my evening would be your favourite?

Goodbye Organic Works!

Friday, April 26, 2013

Yesterday was my last day as the retail purchaser for Organic Works... and it was really hard for me. The staff there have become like my family over these past few months! Peter and Kate were like my cool parents who gave me so much independence in my job, the Chef was like my best friend who I just immediately clicked with, and Brady was like my favourite older brother who was always good for ranting to when or for sharing a few laughs.

The food at the cafe was also amazing - I'm going to miss the food almost as much as the people! I loved everything I ate there, but these were some of my favourites:

Best comfort food meal: Spaghetti squash lasagna with quinoa noodles, sweet potato, spinach, and pounds of mozzarella cheese and garlic toast topped with pesto and cheese on the side.


Best dessert: Nanaimo bars!


Best ethnic dish: Saigon style sweet potato and tempeh curry over brown basmati rice.


Best veggie burger: I've eaten a lot of Chef's veggie burgers and they're all good, but this falafel burger on a focaccia bun with tahini sauce was the best!


Best sandwich: Local roasted turkey on buckwheat bread with avocado spread, tomato, sprouts, red onion, and Dijon. I think I've ordered this sandwich at least 10 times and it never gets old.


Best salad: Massaged kale salad with avocado, nori, marinated tempeh, and toasted hemp seeds. I actually gave Chef the idea for this salad, so I was so excited when she put it on the regular daily menu! Her version is way better than any massaged kale salad I've ever made.


What is the best job you've ever had?

Weekly Meal Plan: April 13 - 19

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Hi everyone! I can't believe I'm moving in 3 days! I'm not even close to ready for it - I still have so much packing to do. Also despite my efforts to eat up the contents of my fridge and freezer, they are still pretty full.

But I tried to plan my meals last week around using up all my food, which helped make a dent. Here's what I planned:

FOODS TO USE UP: Meatballs, cilantro, salmon, feta cheese, pancetta, Irish soda bread, edamame, corn, tortillas, marinara sauce

MEAL PLAN:

Saturday: Edamame soba noodle bowl with a homemade sesame soy stir fry sauce


Sunday: Meatballs with a BBQ sauce glaze, roasted sweet potatoes and broccoli


Monday: Salmon with lemon and parsley, grilled balsamic vegetables, and herb roasted potatoes


Tuesday: Pasta and meatballs with marinara sauce and veggies


Wednesday: "Cobb salad" with a hard boiled egg, pancetta, cherry tomatoes, avocado, and feta cheese over baby spinach with a lemon Dijon dressing and Irish soda bread on the side.


Thursday: Green goddess bowl from my Refresh cookbook with marinated tofu, steamed greens, brown rice, nori, a lemon tahini sauce, and toasted sunflower seeds.


Friday: Leftovers from Thursday.

GROCERY LIST: Bananas, apples, sweet peppers, zucchini, kale, spinach, cherry tomatoes, regular tomatoes, avocado, parsley, lemon, broccoli, large white potato, ginger, black beans, tofu, eggs, and milk.

When was the last time you moved? Any tips?

What was the last recipe you made from a cookbook?

This post is a part of the What I Ate Wednesday link up over at Peas and Crayons.

Veg Out

Monday, April 22, 2013

Is it just me, or are restaurants becoming a lot better about accommodating allergies and dietary restrictions? Two years ago I never would have dreamed I would be able to find a bakery with nut-free treats. And now I know of two.

I also used to never be able to eat at vegan restaurants. In fact, I've called London's only fully vegan restaurant, Veg Out, a few times in the past to ask if they can accommodate nut allergies, but each time I was told it would be too risky. But this week when I called again I got a different answer: they said it would be no problem and that they would be sure to take measures to prevent contamination in the kitchen. This made me so happy!


So on Saturday evening I went there for dinner with my friends Andrea and Rae, who are both big fans of the restaurant. It had such a cute cozy feeling inside - I almost felt like I was eating at someone's house.

For my meal I was debating between the tempeh bacon mushroom melt sandwich and the "bowl of plenty" with greens, veggies, sprouted lentils, pumpkin seeds, flax seeds, and apricots, but when I heard the daily special, I was sold. It was a sweet potato stuffed with curried chickpeas and spinach - yum!


I was so impressed with this meal, and also with the great service. The waitress did a great job of taking care of me and making sure all my allergy-related questions were answered by the kitchen.

I wish I wasn't moving out of the city in 4 days, because I could definitely see myself becoming a regular here!

What's your favourite kind of stuffed vegetable?

Do you have any allergies or dietary restrictions that make it hard to eat at restaurants?

Veg Out on Urbanspoon

Running update

Friday, April 19, 2013

Well, it's been a while since I talked about anything remotely fitness related on this blog, hasn't it? It's because my passion when it comes to fitness is running... which I haven't been able to do regularly since last July.


The last time I blogged about running in March, I mentioned that I was gradually starting to run again through very slow run/walk intervals. But a few weeks ago I started experiencing knee and hip pain again.  So that put an abrupt end to my return to running and sent me back to my physiotherapist for another assessment.

When I went to a sport medicine doctor in November, I was told I had patello-femoral syndrome because of my weak leg and glute muscles, which cause my knees to collapse inwards. So I've been doing exercises given to me by my physiotherapist to strengthen them, such as clamshells and hip bridges.

My legs look like the picture on the right when running.

But when I returned last week complaining of hip pain, she did a more extensive evaluation of my pelvic area and told me I also have awkward posture. Basically in my natural standing position I tend to tuck my tailbone in instead of pushing it out a bit, which is contributing to my hip and lower back pain. So I was given even more exercises to do:

1. Stand in a lunge position with my front leg on a step and gently push forward with my hips, keeping a straight posture, then return to my starting position.

2. Sit on a stability ball and push my pelvis forward all the way, then push it back all the way while keeping a straight posture.

I'm really frustrated because this pain should not have kept me sidelined from running for so long - it's been more than 8 months! I think I'm partially to blame though because I haven't been taking my recovery as seriously as I should - I stopped going to physio after January and I've been terrible at remembering to do my exercises every day.

But it turns out there's another cause to my pain that is not my fault. On Monday I had an appointment with a foot specialist and found out I have extremely flat feet, which cause my knees to turn inward when running and contributes to my problems. So he had me fitted for a pair of orthotics, which will help correct that! He seemed pretty confident that the lack of sufficient support in my shoes is one of the major reasons why I'm still experiencing pain.

I'm hoping between doing my physio exercises (and staying committed to doing them) and getting these orthotics, I'll be able to kick this pain for good and get back out running this summer!!!

Have you ever been sidelined from exercise due to pain or injury? Did recovery go smoothly for you or did you encounter lots of obstacles?

If you've ever done physio, how do you stay motivated to do your exercises?

Weekly Meal Plan: April 6 - 12

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Hi everyone! I've got another meal plan post for you today. Last week was a good one - mostly because it involved three nights of Mexican food. And that means three nights of guacamole. And cheese. Enough said.

I've also started planning my meals around all the foods in my fridge and freezer that I have to use up before I move - there's a lot in there! I made a good dent this week though. Here's what was on my meal plan:

FOODS TO USE UP: Cilantro, frozen beef stock, frozen tortillas, frozen spinach, and frozen homemade Irish soda bread

MEAL PLAN:

Saturday: Tofu stir fry with Sunbutter sauce over brown rice. This is one of my favourite meals so I like putting it on my meal plan at least every few weeks!


Sunday: Sushi with Andrea and Shannon. I got a wakame salad, California roll and salmon roll. Nothing out of the usual for me.


Monday: Homemade beef and quinoa soup with Irish soda bread (from my freezer) on the side. I started out following a recipe for the soup, but I ended up just winging it. It turned out great though!


Tuesday: Soft shell tacos with ground turkey cooked with taco seasoning, homemade guacamole, homemade pico de gallo, lettuce, cheddar cheese, and plain Greek yogurt. Messy to eat - I'm pretty sure half of the fillings fell out onto my plate - but so good.


Wednesday: Taco salad with all the leftover toppings on romaine lettuce. This left me stuffed because of all the protein and healthy fats in this meal. Also, it was a pretty big portion - that bowl is actually a serving bowl!


Thursday: Glory Bowl, which is originally a recipe from the Whitewater Ski Resort in British Columbia. Apparently they had such great dishes there that their customers begged them to make a cookbook, so they released Whitewater Cooks. I wish more restaurants would do that!


Friday: Leftover taco salad

GROCERY LIST: Bananas, apples, berries, sweet peppers, onions, celery, tomatoes, avocado, romaine lettuce, beets, white potatoes, cheddar cheese, stewing beef, ground turkey, taco seasoning, oats, nutritional yeast, plain Greek yogurt, vanilla Greek yogurt

This post is part of the What I Ate Wednesday link up at Peas and Crayons' blog.


What meal do you eat over and over again?

If you could have a cookbook from any restaurant, which restaurant would it be? 

In my thoughts

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Today's post is postponed out of respect for yesterday's events at the Boston marathon. My heart goes out to all the runners, spectators, and their friends and family who were there yesterday. Stay hopeful, stay united, stay strong.

Chelsea

Xyla: Product Review

Sunday, April 14, 2013

A few weeks ago I was contacted by the people at Xyla to see if I wanted to do product review. As a rule, I don't usually do product reviews. However I decided to accept this one because:

A) As a future RD, I think it is important to be familiar with products that my clients may have questions about
B) I thought it would be a good opportunity to provide you guys with some credible information about xylitol.

So Xyla sent me a few products to review, including xylitol crystals, candies, mints and gum. But I thought I'd start off the post by giving some information about it:


What is xylitol?

It is a sugar alcohol, which are derivatives of sugar where one of the chemical groups are replaced by a hydroxyl group. Sugar alcohols also include sorbitol, mannitol, and maltitol (1).  They are naturally found in small amounts in some fruits and vegetables, but the sugar alcohols sold commercially are manufactured from sugars (1,2).

Is it safe?

Yes, Health Canada deems them as safe to consume (2). However, eating more than 10 grams per day (2.5 teaspoons) can cause gas, cramps, diarrhea and bloating. This is because they are not completely absorbed, so they get fermented by bacteria in the intestine leading to these symptoms (1).

Luckily in Canada all products in Canada that contain xylitol must state the grams of xylitol per serving on its label so that we can make sure we don't consume more than 10 grams in a day (2).

Is it calorie free?

No, Xyla contains about 2.4 calories per gram, which is 40% less than the calories contained in sugar (3).

What are the benefits of xylitol?

 Xylitol doesn't raise blood sugar levels, so it is a good choice for people with diabetes (1). Also unlike sugar, it doesn't cause tooth decay (2).

What did I think after trying it?

Since I wanted to know what xylitol tasted like on its own, I ate a small spoonful right out of the package. It didn't have a weird taste, but I could tell it wasn't sugar - it had more of a "cool" taste. Then I decided to put it to the test in one of my favourite recipes: banana bread. Except I made muffins instead, since I didn't have enough bananas to make a whole loaf.


I substituted the xylitol in a 1:1 ratio since it has about the same sweetness as sugar. The verdict: I couldn't taste it at all. If I hadn't known I had made it with xylitol, I would have thought they were just normal muffins made with sugar.

Overall, Xyla seems to be a safe substitute for sugar, holds up well in baking, and doesn't have a weird taste. It does have some GI side effects, but these can be avoided by eating a maximum of 10 grams (or 2.5 teaspoons per day). I would definitely feel comfortable recommending it to future clients who just want to use it in small amounts.

Sources:
1. Sugar alcohols and diabetes: a review (Can J Diabetes).
2. Sugar alcohols (polyols) and polydextrose used as sweeteners in foods (Health Canada).
3. Xylitol Canada website

Have you ever tried xylitol?

Do you use artificial sweeteners? Which is your favourite? 

Disclaimer: I was provided free products from Xyla for the purpose of this review, however I was not compensated in any other way. All opinions are my own.

Cracking Down on Eggs and Cholesterol: Part II

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Recently two meta-analysis papers were published addressing the findings from population studies of the association between egg intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease.1 2 Unfortunately the authors of these two review papers reached contradictory conclusions regarding the dangers of egg intake which is likely to lead to unnecessary public confusion. The authors of the most recent meta-analysis paper reviewed studies on coronary heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and all cardiovascular diseases (CVD) combined and concluded:
Our study suggests that there is a dose-response positive association between egg consumption and the risk of CVD and diabetes.
In contrast to this conclusion, the authors of the earlier meta-analysis paper limited their review to studies that specifically addressed coronary heart disease and stroke and concluded:
Higher consumption of eggs (up to one egg per day) is not associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease or stroke. The increased risk of coronary heart disease among diabetic patients and reduced risk of hemorrhagic stroke associated with higher egg consumption in subgroup analyses warrant further studies.
The second meta-analysis paper is problematic in part because the authors failed to consider the relevant findings from dozens of rigorously controlled feeding experiments on humans and thousands of experiments on animals, including nonhuman primates that strongly support the recommendations to limit the intake of eggs and cholesterol [reviewed previously]. This paper is also problematic in part because the authors failed to consider many other relevant findings from prospective cohort studies which suggest that egg and cholesterol intake increases the risk of coronary heart disease, diabetes, heart failure, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.

Firstly, the association between egg intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease is meaningless without considering suitable substitutes for eggs. As a lower intake of eggs implies a higher intake of other foods in order to maintain caloric balance, the effect that egg intake has on coronary heart disease depends on which foods eggs are substituted for. For example, data from the Nurses’ Health Study, one of the largest studies included in these meta-analyses suggested that replacing one serving of nuts, but not red meat and dairy with one serving of eggs per day is associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease.3 The authors of both meta-analyses failed to address this factor despite the fact that the importance of evaluating suitable food alternatives has been strongly emphasized by many prominent diet-heart researchers.4 The findings from these meta-analyses should therefore be interpreted with caution as eggs may have been primarily compared to processed foods and other animal foods which make up the majority of caloric intake in developed nations.4 5


Eggs, Cholesterol and Diabetics


The authors of the most recent meta-analysis paper found that among diabetics, frequent egg intake was associated with a 83% increased risk of cardiovascular disease, whereas the authors of the earlier meta-analysis paper found that frequent intake was associated with a 54% increased risk of coronary heart disease. The authors of the most recent meta-analysis paper excluded one, while the authors of the earlier meta-analysis paper excluded two additional cohort studies that found that among diabetics, high compared to low intake of eggs was associated with an approximately five-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease.6 7 These additional studies had they been addressed by these authors would have potentially strengthened the association between egg intake and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetics.

The authors of the most recent meta-analysis found that frequent egg intake was associated with a 68% increased risk of type II diabetes, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the authors of the earlier meta-analysis largely failed to address this evidence. A literature search I performed produced papers from 5 separate prospective cohort studies addressing egg intake and the risk of developing type II diabetes, including two additional studies that were not addressed in both meta-analyses papers.8 9 10 11 In addition, I also found one additional cohort study addressing egg intake and the risk of developing gestational diabetes.12 All except one smaller cohort found a statistically significant association after adjusting for potential confounders. These cohorts also found suggestive evidence that the increased risk persisted regardless of whether eggs were consumed in the presence of a higher or lower carbohydrate diet, and that the association was even stronger when repeated measurements of egg intake were considered.9 In addition, these cohorts also found suggestive evidence that the increased risk could partly be explained by the dietary cholesterol and protein content of eggs, and that substituting eggs with carbohydrate-rich foods, especially fiber-rich bread and cereals significantly decreases the risk of developing type II diabetes.8 9 11 12

In the one cohort that did not find a statistically significant association, average egg intake was relatively low and there was suggestive evidence of an increased risk when a follow-up measurement of egg intake was used to update exposure overtime.10 In addition to these findings, a paper from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study also found suggestive evidence that egg intake is associated with an increased risk of type II diabetes.13 Furthermore, papers from an additional 5 cohort studies found that dietary cholesterol was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing either type II diabetes or gestational diabetes.14 15 16

Overall findings from 12 prospective cohort studies with 265,675 participants and 14,497 cases of type II diabetes and gestational diabetes strongly implies that egg and cholesterol intake are significant risk factors in the development of diabetes. In addition to the findings from cohort studies, 4 cross-sectional studies found that egg or cholesterol intake was associated with between a nearly two-fold and greater than four-fold increased risk of developing type II diabetes and gestational diabetes.12 17 18 19 Also consistent with these findings, in the Adventist Health Study 2 it was observed that vegans had a lower risk of developing type II diabetes compared to lacto-ovo vegetarians, and especially non-vegetarians.20

One cohort included in these meta-analyses that used repeated egg intake measurements to update exposure over time found that in diabetics, intake of at least 7 eggs compared to less than 1 egg per week was associated with a two-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality, whereas another cohort that did not use repeated measurements found suggestive evidence of a 30% increased risk of all-cause mortality.21 22 The authors of the first study stated:
…among male physicians with diabetes, any egg consumption is associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality, and there was suggestive evidence for a greater risk of MI [heart attack] and stroke.
An additional study found that in diabetics, an increment of one egg per day was associated with a greater than three-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality.6

According to the International Diabetes Federation, globally approximately 183 million people, or half of those who have diabetes have not been diagnosed. Even in high-income countries about one-third of people with diabetes have not been diagnosed.23 Given this data and the data that egg and cholesterol intake is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing diabetes, and that in diabetics egg intake is associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, there is likely a significantly greater number of people at risk than suggested by the authors of these recent meta-analyses.


Eggs, Cholesterol and Non-Diabetics


The Nurses’ Health Study found that an increment of cholesterol equivalent to one medium size egg per day was associated with a 17% increased risk of all-cause mortality, consistent with the findings from several other studies.24 25 26 Another study included in these meta-analyses found that in non-diabetics, intake of at least 7 eggs compared to less than 1 egg per week was associated with a 22% increased risk of all-cause mortality.21 Also, another cohort from Japan found that frequent egg intake was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in women, consistent with the findings from the Adventists Mortality Study.27 28 In addition, a cohort of elderly found suggestive evidence that egg intake was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, and that substituting eggs with fruits, vegetables and grains significantly decreases risk.29

The authors of the most recent meta-analysis paper found that in largely non-diabetic populations that frequent egg intake was associated with 19% increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared to all other sources of calories combined, which is predominantly processed foods and other animal foods. The authors of the earlier meta-analysis that did not reach this conclusion suggested that their findings are relevant for total cardiovascular disease but failed to address the findings from prospective cohort studies regarding the risk for heart failure. For example, two cohort studies which were included in the most recent meta-analyses found that intake of at least 7 eggs compared to less than 1 egg per week was associated with an approximately 30% increased risk of heart failure.30 31

Another potential important finding that has contributed to the knowledge of the dangers of eggs are the results from studies that were carried out on populations with a low habitual cholesterol intake, such as vegetarian populations. The authors of the most recent meta-analysis paper excluded one, while the authors of the earlier meta-analysis paper excluded two cohort studies that were carried out on largely vegetarian populations. Frequent consumption of eggs was associated with a more than 2.5 increased risk of fatal coronary heart disease in the Oxford Vegetarian Study and also an increased risk in females in the Adventists Mortality Study.28 32 The characteristics of the participants in these studies differ from that of most other studies, not only because of the their lower habitual intake of dietary cholesterol, but also because of their lower rates of obesity and typically healthier overall diet. Therefore separately analyzing egg intake in this subgroup of the population may be of significant importance. The authors of a paper from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study cited in these meta-analyses described the potential importance of addressing egg intake in people with very low habitual cholesterol intake and how their study may have been inadequate to test this hypothesis: 33
One potential alternative explanation for the null finding is that background dietary cholesterol may be so high in the usual Western diet that adding somewhat more has little further effect on blood cholesterol. In a randomized trial, Sacks et al found that adding 1 egg per day to the usual diet of 17 lactovegetarians whose habitual cholesterol intake was very low (97 mg/d) significantly increased LDL cholesterol level by 12%. In our analyses, differences in non-egg cholesterol intake did not appear to be an explanation for the null association between egg consumption and risk of CHD. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that egg consumption may increase the risk among participants with very low background cholesterol intake.
As it is well documented that cholesterol intake has a much greater effect of raising serum cholesterol when baseline intake is very low, this may in part explain why egg and cholesterol intake was more strongly associated with coronary heart disease in studies on largely vegetarian populations.34 35 Another explanation for a possibly stronger association in vegetarian populations is that egg intake may have a greater effect in leaner people, and it has been well documented that vegetarians are generally leaner than their omnivorous counterparts [reviewed previously]. This hypothesis is supported by several dietary experiments which found that dietary cholesterol had a greater effect of raising serum cholesterol among leaner compared to overweight participants.36 37 This hypothesis is also supported by the findings from the Chicago Western Electric Study which found that while dietary cholesterol was associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease in lean men over and above the adverse effects it has on serum cholesterol, increased intake had little appreciable effect on men with a greater BMI and body fatness.38 Another explanation for these findings is that vegetarians may choose healthier substitutes for eggs, such as nuts which was associated with a significantly lower risk of coronary heart disease compared to eggs in the Nurses’ Health Study.3

It was found in a sub-analysis based on 4 cohorts included in the earlier meta-analyses that egg intake was associated with an 18% non-significant increased risk of fatal coronary heart disease. The addition of the mortality findings from the two largely vegetarian cohorts that were excluded from this meta-analysis would have likely strengthened this association.28 32 This suggests that similar to saturated fat intake, egg intake may increase the risk of fatal coronary heart disease more than non-fatal coronary heart disease [reviewed previously]. The lack of a significant association likely reflects the fact that eggs were not compared to healthy foods, and also likely due to misclassification of participants into ranges of usual dietary intake as the result of measurement error [reviewed previously].

In the video below Dr. Michael Gregor addresses recent research on choline when consumed from eggs and other animal foods and the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Carnitine, Choline, Cancer and Cholesterol: The TMAO Connection


Egg Intake and Stroke


In regards to a sub-group analysis of 5 cohort studies, the authors of the earlier meta-analysis suggested that egg intake was associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The authors suggested that the inverse association between egg intake and hemorrhagic stroke is supported by findings of an inverse association between serum cholesterol and hemorrhagic stroke in several cohort studies. However, in the largest cohort study the authors cited, the inverse association was confined to participants with elevated blood pressure.39 A similar interaction between blood pressure and serum cholesterol and hemorrhagic stroke was observed in much larger cohort studies in both Asian and Western populations that the authors of this meta-analysis conveniently failed to cite.40 41 In a meta-analysis of 61 cohort studies it was found that among participants with near optimal systolic blood pressure (<125 mmHg), lower serum cholesterol was actually associated with a significantly lower risk of hemorrhagic, ischemic and total stroke mortality [reviewed previously]. Furthermore, most mammalian species have very low LDL levels (mean value of 42 mg/dl in 18 species), and there is very scant evidence that these animals are at high risk of having a stroke.42

This data demonstrates that continued emphasis should be placed on lowering both LDL cholesterol and blood pressure which have been proven in hundreds of randomized controlled trials to lower not only the risk of cardiovascular disease, but also all-cause mortality.43 44 Increasing the intake of eggs after achieving a near optimal blood pressure is unlikely to reduce the risk of hemorrhagic stroke and will likely increase the risk of dying of any cause.


Unwarranted Mediocre Health Recommendations


The conclusions of the earlier meta-analysis are misleading and inconsistent with the body of literature. What is more concerning is that these findings will likely be used in marketing campaigns to confuse the general population, of which the great majority are already at risk of cardiovascular disease. The most recent meta-analysis paper while being overall informative and more clearly demonstrating the dangers of eggs for both diabetics and non-diabetics, the authors still failed to address many important findings that have been addressed in this series of posts. A greater emphasis on the effects of replacing eggs with other suitable foods is required, and the available evidence suggests a significant benefit of replacing eggs with whole plant foods, including fruits, vegetables, whole grains and nuts.3 11 29 As Spence and colleagues pointed out in regards to recent controversy surrounding dietary cholesterol and eggs:45
…the only ones who could eat egg yolk regularly with impunity would be those who expect to die prematurely from nonvascular causes.


Diet-Heart Posts


Part I - Diet-Heart: A Problematic Revisit
Part II - Diet-Heart: Saturated Fat and Blood Cholesterol
Part III - Diet-Heart: The Role of Vegetarian Diets in the Hypothesis
Part IV - Cracking Down on Eggs and Cholesterol


Please post any comments in the Discussion Thread.

Cracking Down on Eggs and Cholesterol

Since the breakthrough led by Nikolai Anichkov a century ago, the feeding of cholesterol, and to an extent, dietary fat have been recognized as the sine qua nons for the dietary modification of experimental atherosclerosis, and have been used in thousands of experiments to successfully accelerate the development of atherosclerosis in mammalian, avian and fish species, not only of herbivorous, but also omnivorous and carnivorous nature.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 This includes the promotion of experimental atherosclerosis in over one dozen different species of nonhuman primates- New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, and great apes including the closest living relative to humans, the chimpanzee (Fig. 1).2 3 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 The atherosclerotic lesions induced by cholesterol feeding, including in the form of fresh eggs yolks in many opportunistic omnivores, such as various species of nonhuman primates, birds and pigs have been shown to closely resemble the disease in humans.1 2 3 4 22 23 24

Figure 1. Aortic atherosclerosis of a chimpanzee which died of a heart attack after long-term feeding of a diet rich in cholesterol and artery-clogging saturated fat

It has also been observed that the long-term feeding of cholesterol and saturated fat has resulted in heart attacks, sudden death, development of gangrene, softening on the bones and numerous other serious complications in nonhuman primates.2 3 25 26 27 28 For example, it has been shown that when diets rich in cholesterol and saturated fat are fed to monkeys of the genus Macaca, including the rhesus monkey and the crab-eating macaque, they experience heart attacks at approximately the same rate as high-risk populations living in developed nations.3

In species that are unlike humans, very resistant to dietary induced elevations in LDL cholesterol, such as the order of the carnivora, unless LDL-receptor deficient breeds are used atherosclerosis is typically induced by raising serum (blood) cholesterol with a diet with very large amounts of dietary cholesterol, and either containing thiouracil or deficient in essential fatty acids.9 10 29 As noted by Steinberg:30
The point is very clearly made: the arteries of virtually every animal species are susceptible to this disease if only the blood cholesterol level can be raised enough and maintained high enough a long enough period of time.
Long-term feeding of cholesterol in relatively small amounts has actually been shown to induce atherosclerosis in rabbits, chickens, pigeons and monkeys despite only small or insignificant increases in serum cholesterol.1 4 13 Armstrong and colleagues conducted an experiment ‘designed to demonstrate a null point of the effect of dietary cholesterol on the arterial intima’, by comparing a group of rhesus monkeys fed a cholesterol-free diet with a group fed cholesterol equivalent to that found in only half of a small egg in the average human diet of 2,000 calories per day (43µg/kcal). However, even when fed in very small amounts dietary cholesterol still had a significant adverse effect on these monkeys arteries after a period of only 18 months (Fig. 2).13 Armstrong and colleagues concluded:
No null point for the effect of dietary cholesterol on arterial intima was found even at an intake level far below that conventionally used for the induction of experimental atherosclerosis in the nonhuman primate. The intimal changes found in response to very low cholesterol intake imply that subtle qualitative alterations in lipoproteins are of critical importance to our understanding of lesion induction.

Figure 2. Subclavian artery from a rhesus monkey fed very small amounts of dietary cholesterol (43µg/kcal). Sudanophilia (black area) is intense in the area of major intimal thickening

It has also been demonstrated that the cessation of a cholesterol-rich diet and the subsequent lowering of serum cholesterol results in the regression of atherosclerosis in various mammalian and avian species, including herbivores, omnivores, carnivores and nonhuman primates.31 In one experiment Armstrong and colleagues induced severe atherosclerosis in rhesus monkeys by feeding a diet with 40% of calories from egg yolks for 17 months. The egg yolks were then removed from the monkeys diet and replaced with a cholesterol-free diet with either 40% of calories from corn oil or low-fat chow with 77% calories from sugar for three years, resulting in a reduction of serum cholesterol to <140 mg/dl and a marked regression of atherosclerosis.32 33

In a recently published study, Spence and colleagues observed that egg yolk consumption was associated with carotid plaque in high-risk patients.34 These findings should not come as a surprise considering the evidence accumulated from thousands of animal experiments over the last 100 years, which have demonstrated that the feeding of cholesterol and saturated fat accelerates the development of atherosclerosis in virtually every vertebrate that has been sufficiently challenged. These lines of evidence have been neglected by the egg industry and promoters of cholesterol laden diets (ie. Paleo, Primal and low-carb) who have attempted to discredit this study without considering the relevant evidence. As noted by Stamler:35
To neglect this fact in a review about humans is to imply that the Darwinian foundation of biomedical research is invalid and/or that there is a body of substantial contrary evidence in humans. Neither is the case. 
These findings from Spence and colleagues are not only supported by the findings from animal experiments, but also by numerous previous human studies that found a positive association between dietary cholesterol and the severity of atherosclerosis.36 37 38 39

In the video below Dr. Michael Greger addresses the completely unethical measures that the egg industry resorted to in order to confuse the general public about these findings from Spence and colleagues, including attempts to bribe researchers.

Eggs vs. Cigarettes in Atherosclerosis

In the video below Plant Positive addresses various critiques of Spence and colleagues findings, as well as other relevant research on dietary cholesterol.

Cholesterol Confusion 6 Dietary Cholesterol (And the Magic Egg)


Eggs, Cholesterol and Xanthomatosis


In addition to developing atherosclerosis and gangrene, the feeding of egg yolks and cholesterol to various species of nonhuman primates has also resulted in the development of xanthomatosis, a condition where deposits of cholesterol develop underneath the skin and is associated with chronically elevated serum cholesterol.18 40 41 42 43 This condition has been shown to be cured in nonhuman primates upon the cessation of a cholesterol-rich diet.41 A case report found that a 30-year-old woman with a healthy body weight who had been following a carbohydrate restricted diet for three and a half years had developed xanthomas on her hands and a chronically elevated serum cholesterol level of 940 mg/dl.44 The composition of the woman’s diet was reported as follows:
Each day she had consumed eight to 12 eggs, one or two lean steaks or half a small chicken and, half to one litre of milk. Sometimes some cottage cheese or tomatoes enriched the menu and, on rare occasions, fruit. She completely avoided butter, bread, potatoes, rice, noodles, alcohol, or any other food or beverage containing carbohydrate. The daily cholesterol intake, which was mainly derived from the egg yolks, was about 3500 mg. The total calorie intake was about 8-4 MJ (2000 kcal) (35 % protein, 55 % fat, and 10 % carbohydrates, polyunsaturated fat:saturated fat (P:S) ratio=0 26).
The woman was advised to change her diet, and in particular to stop eating eggs. After 16 days her serum cholesterol dropped to 750 mg/dl, and after several years dropped to 188 mg/dl and the lipid deposits on her skin had cleared up. This woman’s diet induced xanthomas and chronically elevated cholesterol resemble the characteristics of people with homozygous familial hypercholesteromia, a rare genetic disorder that results in chronically elevated concentrations of predominantly large LDL cholesterol particles.45 People with this disorder are short lived and often experience heart attacks during childhood.46 Such unfavorable risk factors would normally be of great concern to any responsible physician. However, despite the overwhelming evidence of the danger of elevated serum total and LDL cholesterol,30 47 48 including for women,49 50 Sally Fallon and Mary Enig, the founders of the Weston A. Price Foundation claim that ‘For women, there is no greater risk for heart disease, even at levels as high as 1000 mg/d’.51 It is clear that this organization has little concern for the wellbeing of people.


Eggs, Cholesterol and Serum Lipids


It has been well established in rigorously controlled feeding experiments that adding dietary cholesterol to a diet that is low in cholesterol can significantly raise serum cholesterol in humans.52 An addition of 200 mg cholesterol per day to a cholesterol-free diet has been shown to raise serum cholesterol by as much as 20%.53 This may be largely explained by the strong evidence that dietary cholesterol down-regulates the LDL receptor.54 However, as Hopkins addressed in a meta-analysis of rigorously controlled feeding experiments, there exists a ceiling effect at which adding additional dietary cholesterol to a diet already rich in cholesterol has little appreciable effect on serum cholesterol (Fig. 3). Therefore, the fact that numerous studies carried out on populations with a relatively high baseline cholesterol intake failed to find a significant association between cholesterol intake and serum cholesterol does not negate the evidence that lowering intake to near zero will significantly lower serum cholesterol.

Figure 3. Effects of added dietary cholesterol on serum total cholesterol at different baseline levels of intake

Several controlled experiments have found that overweight compared to lean people, and insulin resistant compared to insulin sensitive people are less responsive to dietary cholesterol.55 56 This likely explains why researchers who have financial or personal connections with the egg industry have specifically selected overweight and insulin resistant participants with a modestly high baseline dietary cholesterol intake for controlled trials, as it can be pre-empted that this subgroup of the population will show little response when egg intake is increased.

It has been demonstrated in multiple meta-analyses of rigorously controlled feeding experiments that dietary cholesterol, including that from eggs yolks does have a modest adverse effect on the LDL:HDL cholesterol ratio.57 58 Furthermore, unlike for LDL cholesterol, there is limited causal evidence that simply raising HDL will lower the risk of coronary heart disease. For example, a meta-analysis of 108 randomized controlled trials found that while lowering LDL cholesterol significantly decreased the risk of coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality, modifying HDL had little appreciable effect after controlling for LDL cholesterol.47 In addition, a recent meta-analysis of mendelian randomization studies found that while genetically modified LDL significantly influenced the risk of coronary heart disease, genetically modified HDL had little appreciable influence.59 This evidence together with the evidence that dietary cholesterol adversely influences both concentrations of LDL as well as the LDL:HDL ratio, especially in healthy people reinforces the recommendations to limit egg and cholesterol intake.

Another contributor to confusion caused by studies typically influenced by the egg industry is the suggestion that dietary cholesterol does not increase the number of LDL particles, or only increases the concentration of large LDL particles, which is considered by some to be less atherogenic. However, as elaborated by Plant Positive, several studies not influenced by the egg industry have found that cholesterol intake does increase the total number of LDL particles in healthy people.60 61 In addition, a systematic review found that higher LDL particle number, but not other LDL subfractions was consistently associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, independent of other lipid measurements.62 The National Lipid Association Expert Panel recently concluded that ‘All lipoprotein particles in the LDL fraction are atherogenic, independent of size’, and was unable to identify any patient subgroups in which LDL subfraction measurements are recommended. In specific, the panel provided the following evidence for these conclusions:63
Studies have linked large LDL particles to atherosclerosis in nonhuman primates, in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (who have an elevated concentration of predominantly large LDL particles), in participants of the population-based MESA study, in normolipidemic men with CHD, and among patients after MI [heart attack] in the Cholesterol And Recurrent Events (CARE) study... Many studies document links between small dense LDL particles and atherosclerotic CVD. However, these statistical associations between small, dense LDL and CV [cardiovascular] outcomes are either significantly attenuated or abolished when the analyses are adjusted for the overall number of circulating LDL particles (LDL-P) either by adjustment for Apo B levels or by adjustment for nuclear magnetic resonance-derived LDL-P... To date, there is no evidence that the shift in LDL subfractions directly translates into change in disease progression or improved outcome.
More recently a meta-analysis of mendelian randomization studies with over 312,000 individuals found that inheriting any of nine studied genetic variants that modify lifelong LDL cholesterol concentrations, but not any other known risk factors predicted a 55% lower risk of coronary heart disease for each mmol/l (38.7 mg/dl) lower LDL cholesterol.48 Despite having significantly different effects on LDL particle sizes, all of the nine studied genetic variants predicted essentially the same decrease in coronary heart disease per unit lower LDL cholesterol, including the gene responsible for familial hypercholesterolemia which elevates predominantly large LDL particles.45 Therefore there is convincing evidence that large LDL particles promote atherosclerosis.

The elevation of LDL cholesterol is not the only adverse effect that increased intake of eggs and cholesterol confers. As Spence and colleagues also pointed out in regards to recent controversy surrounding dietary cholesterol:40 64
Focusing on fasting serum cholesterol levels misses the bulk of the problem. Even though serum cholesterol rises very little after a meal, dietary cholesterol increases the susceptibility of LDL-C to oxidation, vascular inflammation, oxidative stress, and postprandial hyperlipemia and potentiates the harmful effects of saturated fat, impairs endothelial function, and increases cardiovascular events.

Classical Observations


Multiple international studies based on data from the World Health Organization have found the mean per capita dietary cholesterol levels are consistently associated with the rates of coronary heart disease mortality.39 65 This includes a large study of 40 countries.66 Similarly, it was found in the 25 year follow-up of the Seven Countries Study that dietary cholesterol was associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease across the 16 cohorts.67

In a review of the literature, Uffe Ravnskov, the spokesperson for The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics reviewed 15 of the earliest prospective (longitudinal) cohort studies and inappropriately concluded that ‘Overall, longitudinal studies within population have found no difference between the diet of coronary patients and others’.68 Fourteen of these studies measured cholesterol intake, of which for the Chicago Western Electric Study Ravnskov inappropriately cited data from an earlier follow-up that found no association rather than the longer follow-up which found a significant association. Among the remaining thirteen studies, the participants who developed coronary heart disease actually had on average 13 mg/day greater intake of cholesterol for someone consuming on average 2,000 calories a day.

Considering the probable degree of measurement error dietary intake and the fact that these studies were carried out in largely homogenous populations where most people had similar diets, only relatively small differences in dietary composition would have been expected between participants with and without heart disease even if diet does play a major role in heart disease [reviewed previously]. Furthermore, Ravnskov failed to mention that four of the largest studies that he cited, including the Chicago Western Electric Study found on average that 200 mg/1,000 calories higher intake of cholesterol was associated with a 30% increased risk of coronary heart disease over and above the adverse effects it has on serum cholesterol.64

The next post in this series will focus on findings from more recent prospective cohort studies that addressed the intake eggs and cholesterol and the risk of coronary heart disease, diabetes, heart failure, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Many of these important findings have gone unaddressed in recent reviews of the literature.


Diet-Heart Posts




Please post any comments in the Discussion Thread.

 

Blogger news